Skip to content

Literature

Literature in the Future

In recent times seem to proliferate online publications, in which content is noticed that everyone is concerned about the science, dissemination and indexing, but … What about literature?
For the definition of literature would need an encyclopedia or something else, so I will refer to this term as opposed to scientific and academic literature, that is, broadly understood as a fiction literature, which has in principle delight and inform, to then proceed with reflection.
When asked about what the future of online publications, I dare say that a dynamic future. The first thing that comes and what is happening is a change, a movement that always generates another. In this sense, the role of publishers is changing, in turn causing a change in others in a kind of circuit:
Transformation of the -> transformation of the reader -> modify the content. Transformation of content -> transformation of the reader -> transformation of the environment. Transformation of the reader -> modify the content -> transformation of the way …
In a sequence ad infinitum, maybe it’s time that critics and scholars on the subject ask the question: “What came first, the chicken or the egg?”, Ie which evolved before: the writers and narrative, technology and books or readers, and its demand.
I have an idea that I can not attach files to preservation, why this desire to perpetuate all, if we ourselves are not infinite? It pops out the answer, but what I think is that in our zeal for conservation or preservation, some things have to endure enough. Philosophical issues aside, one aspect in the future of electronic publishing is precisely the preservation of the material that otherwise would fall apart with the touch of air. So we played a kind of Dorian Gray, painting portraits in reverse: stay the representation, although the original is gone.
Almost always conceived as a passive reader, because it is the receiving end of a speech, making it possibly be the ultimate in change, according to the circuit presented. Because it is possible for the user / reader is changing now, what has to adapt, then, is literature. However, entering the field of communication theory and mass communication, this will be the subject of another study. What is clear to me that for a long while, we will continue reading the books for years, the classics, the essential, although they also move and become and are becoming more numerous, which, however, not the case with some.

In recent times seem to proliferate online publications, in which content is noticed that everyone is concerned about the science, dissemination and indexing, but … What about literature?
For the definition of literature would need an encyclopedia or something else, so I will refer to this term as opposed to scientific and academic literature, that is, broadly understood as a fiction literature, which has in principle delight and inform, to then proceed with reflection.
When asked about what the future of online publications, I dare say that a dynamic future. The first thing that comes and what is happening is a change, a movement that always generates another. In this sense, the role of publishers is changing, in turn causing a change in others in a kind of circuit:
Transformation of the -> transformation of the reader -> modify the content. Transformation of content -> transformation of the reader -> transformation of the environment. Transformation of the reader -> modify the content -> transformation of the way …
In a sequence ad infinitum, maybe it’s time that critics and scholars on the subject ask the question: “What came first, the chicken or the egg?”, Ie which evolved before: the writers and narrative, technology and books or readers, and its demand.
I have an idea that I can not attach files to preservation, why this desire to perpetuate all, if we ourselves are not infinite? It pops out the answer, but what I think is that in our zeal for conservation or preservation, some things have to endure enough. Philosophical issues aside, one aspect in the future of electronic publishing is precisely the preservation of the material that otherwise would fall apart with the touch of air. So we played a kind of Dorian Gray, painting portraits in reverse: stay the representation, although the original is gone.
Almost always conceived as a passive reader, because it is the receiving end of a speech, making it possibly be the ultimate in change, according to the circuit presented. Because it is possible for the user / reader is changing now, what has to adapt, then, is literature. However, entering the field of communication theory and mass communication, this will be the subject of another study. What is clear to me that for a long while, we will continue reading the books for years, the classics, the essential, although they also move and become and are becoming more numerous, which, however, not the case with some…..Other changes